Hastighetsskylt 40 km/h

As part of its remit from the government, Transport Analysis has studied the effects of reduced default speed limits in built-up areas on Sweden’s transport policy goals. It is up to the municipalities themselves to determine what areas constitute built-up areas. Current law sets a default speed limit of 50 km/h in such areas, unless otherwise posted.

The clearest quantifiable positive effects are seen in the area of traffic safety, where speed is of decisive importance. The magnitude of these effects depends in part on what roads are assigned lower speed limits, and on the extent to which drivers actually reduce their speed. Previous experience points to an average speed reduction of 1–4 km/h if the posted speed limit is reduced from 50 to 40 km/h.

Working within the framework of this task, we have modelled and calculated these effects for three different scenarios in built-up areas:

  • All streets with a 50 km/h speed limit have their speed limit reduced to 40 km/h, reducing the number of fatalities by five.
  • Approximately 80% of the streets (based on vehicle miles) with a 50 km/h speed limit have their speed limit reduced to 40 km/h while the remaining 20% stay at 50 km/h, reducing the number of fatalities by four.
  • Approximately 80% of the streets (based on vehicle miles) with a 50 km/h speed limit have their speed limit reduced to 40 km/h while the remaining 20% have their speed limit raised to 60 km/h, reducing the number of fatalities by three.

Positive effects on the numbers of severe injuries are naturally seen as well. The effects on traffic safety are greater if the road operator succeeds in reducing speeds still further. Seventeen lives would be saved in scenario 1 if the speed limit were reduced by 10 km/h, meaning that we have identified a range of three to 17 lives saved. The effects of these scenarios may be considered in relation to the fact that roughly 65 fatalities occur in built-up areas per year in Sweden.

It is reduced speed that yields the positive effects in terms of Swedish transport policy goals and urban environments. There are methods other than lowering the default speed limit that must also be considered when it comes to achieving lower speeds.

Transport Analysis proposes a five-year implementation period, so that the municipalities have enough time to conduct the necessary studies, repost speed limits, and make street scene adaptations. These measures are also associated with costs to the municipalities.

Transport Analysis recommends that a new default speed limit of 40 km/h be implemented in built-up areas. One distinct advantage of introducing a new default speed limit is that it would impact the entire country quickly. Another advantage of a default speed limit is that could reduce confusion and contribute to the more uniform application of speed limits throughout Sweden. Choosing 40 km/h as the default speed limit rather than 30 km/h offers a way of offsetting the travel-time losses that a comprehensive reduction to 30 km/h would probably entail. However, this report has shown in a number of cases that a speed limit of 30 km/h yields greater positive effects in terms of, for example, traffic safety and security, which, in combination with an altered urban environment, could induce more people to bicycle and walk in the long term.

Summary report (in English)